Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Guglielmi v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 2:2012cv01733
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Guglielmi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05152
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James M Jerra v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01907
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons BOP, Control Officer Corn, Control Officer Corn and others
Plaintiff:
James M Jerra
Gimbel v. United States et al
as 3:2011cv05503
Plaintiff:
John Gimbel
Defendant:
United States, State of California, U.S. Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gimbel v. United States et al
as 3:2011cv05503
Plaintiff:
John Gimbel
Defendant:
United States, State of California, U.S. Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gimbel v. United States et al
as 1:2011cv05503
Plaintiff:
John Gimbel
Defendant:
United States, State of California, U.S. Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv09122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Bryant v. United States Bureau of Prison, et al
as 11-56371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons, ROBERT E. MCFADDEN, in his official capacity as Regional Director of the United States Bureau of Prions Western Region and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06688
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniels v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv00021
Petitioner:
Jason Daniels
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Guam Department of Corrections, U.S. Marshal's Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
