Cases 41 - 50 of 147
Rahkin Brock v. County of Fresno on behalf of Fresno County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2018at00853
Defendant:
County of Fresno on behalf of Fresno County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Ernest O'Neil Rahkin Brock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv07086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Michael Brent Pectol v. Brent Ernest Pectol et al
as 2:2018cv05870
Defendant:
Employees Shasta County District Attorneys Office, Douglas McMullin, Verlin Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Brent Pectol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pectol et al v. Pectol et al
as 3:2018cv00717
Plaintiff:
Michael Brent Pectol, Vahina Angie Pectol, Taj Tou Pectol and others
Defendant:
Brent Ernest Pectol, Kathryn Louise Pectol, Shasta County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vargas v. Riley et al
as 3:2018cv00567
Plaintiff:
Manuel Vargas
Defendant:
Dedrick Riley, Lance Bell, Daniell Evens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PS) Gifford v. Kampa et al
as 2:2017cv02421
Defendant:
Peter Kampa, Julie Bowles, Ernest Goff and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Gifford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv04166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ximenez v. Gold et al
as 2:2017cv01325
Plaintiff:
Amy B Ximenez
Defendant:
Antonio Gold, Charles King, Jr, Ernest McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Bradstreet et al
as 3:2017cv02257
Plaintiff:
Tamiko Powell
Defendant:
Angela Bradstreet, Ronald Quidachay and Ernest Goldsmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
