Cases 61 - 70 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ovechka v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2015cv05474
Defendant:
Pierce County , Miguel Balderrama , Mary Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Leldon Roy Ovechka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce et al v. City of Des Moines et al
as 2:2015cv00397
Plaintiff:
Chad A Pierce
Defendant:
City of Des Moines, City of Des Moines Police Department, Washington State Department of Social and Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv06019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roe 1 et al v. Anderson et al
as 3:2014cv05810
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe 1 , Jane Roe 2 and Dreamgirls of Tacoma LLC
Defendant:
Julie Anderson , Pierce County and David Van Vleet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mahoney et al v. Holder et al
as 2:2014cv00794
Plaintiff:
Robert Mahoney, Sjon C Stevens, Cliff Borjeson and others
Defendant:
Eric Holder, City of Seattle , Ed Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE OPENED/TRANSFERRED
as 2:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Philip Anderson , Ted Clausing , Pete Lopushinsky and others
Defendant:
Ted Strong and Rick Watlamet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson et al v. Strong et al
as 1:2014cv03061
Plaintiff:
Philip Anderson , Ted Clausing , Pete Lopushinsky and others
Defendant:
Ted Strong and Rick Watlamet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00349
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lott v. Anderson et al
as 2:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
David Lott
Defendant:
Zack Anderson , Jacob Berry and City of Tukwila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
