Cases 71 - 80 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Charles Knapp v. State of Nevada ex rel. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00686
Defendant:
State of Nevada ex rel. Department of Corrections and William Donat
Plaintiff:
Charles Knapp
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NOT USED
as 2:2008cv01000
Plaintiff:
Raymond Padilla
Defendant:
State of Nevada in rel. The Nevada Department of Corrections, Jim Gibbons, Kenny Guinn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NOT USED
as 2:2008cv00938
Plaintiff:
Scott Kanvick
Defendant:
E. K. McDaniel, Howard Skolnik, Mark Drain and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Helen Jane Romero et al v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv00808
Defendant:
Nevada Department Of Corrections, E.K. McDaniel, Michael J Stolk and others
Plaintiff:
Helen Jane Romero, Anthony G. Beltran, Jr., Britnie Nicole Beltran and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dougherty et al v. MCDANIEL et al
as 3:2008cv00192
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Dougherty, Elizabeth Ann Dougherty, Patrick James Cavanaugh, Jr. and others
Defendant:
E.K. MCDANIEL, Debra Brooks, Adam Endel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
White v. Gibbons et al
as 2:2008cv00388
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lloyd White
Defendant:
Jim Gibbons, Catherine Cortez Masto, Ross Miller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
