Cases 81 - 90 of 120
Jackson v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2012cv01233
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dean Jackson
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2012cv00944
Plaintiff:
Traris Newman
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Travis Aguirre and Anthony Daley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strickler v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2012cv00344
Plaintiff:
Larry Strickler
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio , Sean Anthony Edwards-El , Unknown Edwards-El and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coates et al v. Santa Cruz, County of et al
as 4:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
Wayne Coates and Patricia Wiercinski
Defendant:
Santa Cruz, County of , Keith Barth , Beth Barth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reidhead et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2012cv00089
Plaintiff:
George Reidhead , Estate of Brenda Lee Todd , Liana Todd and others
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Charles L Ryan, John Coughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guinn v. Bartlett
as 3:2011cv08174
Plaintiff:
Anthony W Guinn
Defendant:
Randolph A Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kotzeva v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona et al
as 2:2011cv01844
Plaintiff:
Daniela Kotzeva
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Laura Reckart, Phoenix, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scarim v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01736
Plaintiff:
Anita J Scarim
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Dora B Schriro, Michael Adu-Tutu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01495
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill et al v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2011cv01324
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hill , Anthony Gibson , David Marshall and others
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of and David Richert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
