Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Isidro J. Armenta v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv03753
Plaintiff:
Isidro J. Armenta
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Jose Carias, Chief Michel Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Appiah et al v. Armenta
as 3:2021cv00688
Defendant:
Joseph Armenta
Plaintiff:
Dawn Wentworth and Yaw Appiah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
In re Wentworth Civil Rights Cases
as 3:2021cv00757
Defendant:
San Diego County Sheriff's Dept & Personnel, CA State Board of Education & Personnel, State Board of Education & Personnel and others
Plaintiff:
Yaw Appiah, Journee Hudson and Dawn Wentworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Jonathan VanLoan et al v. The Nation of Islam et al
as 2:2020cv00127
Defendant:
Samuel Lee, Steve Soboroff, Gleam Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan VanLoan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan VanLoan v. The Nation of Islam et al
as 2:2019cv00197
Defendant:
Samuel Lee, Gleam Davis, Aurelio Mattucci and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan VanLoan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feliciana Escobedo v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv04911
Defendant:
Manuel Armenta, City of Los Angeles and Does
Plaintiff:
Feliciana Escobedo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
