Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Biesenbach v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 4:2023cv03423
Plaintiff:
Klaus Biesenbach
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department, San Francisco Housing Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv01332
Plaintiff:
Joshua Williams, Jennifer Lewis, David Klaus and others
Defendant:
Governor Kate Brown, Director Patrick Allen, Kate Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vida v. Fornia et al
as 3:2017cv01547
Defendant:
Summer Brielle, Franklin Collins, John L. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
George Vida, Margarete Vida and Robert Vida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vida v. Klaus
as 3:2017cv01201
Defendant:
Dr. Martin Klaus
Plaintiff:
George Vida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Vida v. Gates et al
as 3:2017cv01202
Defendant:
Franklin Easterday, Bill Gates, Ancer L. Haggerty and others
Plaintiff:
George Vida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00920
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01673
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
F. v. Alameda Police Department et al
as 4:2014cv00485
Plaintiff:
L. F.
Defendant:
Alameda Police Department, Alameda Unified School District, Erik Klaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruth Gean v. Estate of William Hyde Wollast, et al
as 13-17144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUTH EBER GEAN, AKA Ruth Eber Gene
Defendant - Appellee:
ESTATE OF WILLIAM HYDE WOLLASTON, ESTATE OF OSANN G.W., ESTATE OF KLAUS K.K. and others
Ruth Gean v. Estate of William Hyde Wollast, et al
as 12-16875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUTH EBER GEAN, AKA Ruth Eber Gene
Defendant - Appellee:
ESTATE OF WILLIAM HYDE WOLLASTON, ESTATE OF OSANN G.W., ESTATE OF KLAUS K.K. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
