Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Meghan O Malley-Kail et al v. Chad Bianco et al
as 5:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Maya Kail, Leah Kail, Meghan O'Malley-Kail and others
Defendant:
Chad Bianco, Garrett Schultz, Michael Gundry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez et al v. City of Fresno et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Desiree Martinez and We Are Not Invisible
Defendant:
City of Fresno, Howard Lacy, David Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lacy v. Turner
as 1:2023cv01763
Plaintiff:
Janice Lacy
Defendant:
Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hillard et al v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2023cv06573
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Hillard, Danyel Lacy, Kaycee Suitter and others
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Tammany Brooks, Tony Morefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-16131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
(PS) Ahmad v. Newsom et al
as 2:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Noman Ahmad
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, El Concilio, LLC, Martin Hoshino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Mattson et al v. Streibel et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lacy Mattson and Daniel W Vogt
Defendant:
Aron Streibel and City of Caldwell, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mattson v. Streibel, et al.
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lacy Mattson
Defendant:
Aron Streibel, Daniel W Vogt, City of Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
