Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lisa Douglass v. Bertlsemann Group Germany et al
as 2:2020cv07006
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Karen Tucker, Bob Spivak and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Douglass and Lisa M Douglass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neylon et al v. County of Inyo et al
as 1:2016at00371
Plaintiff:
Melissa M. Neylon and Shawn P. Neylon
Defendant:
County of Inyo, Inyo County Sheriff's Office, Bill Lutze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neylon et al v. County of Inyo et al
as 1:2016cv00712
Plaintiff:
Melissa M. Neylon and Shawn P. Neylon
Defendant:
County of Inyo, Inyo County Sheriff's Office, Bill Lutze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Tulare County et al
as 1:2015cv01779
Plaintiff:
Wendy Jones and William Fabricius
Defendant:
Tulare County, Tulare County Animal Control, Tulare County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Tulare County et al
as 1:2015at00943
Plaintiff:
Wendy Jones and William Fabricius
Defendant:
Tulare County, tulare county animal Control, tulare county sheriff's office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015at00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02551
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lutz v. CBRE Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02625
Plaintiff:
Ray Lutz
Defendant:
CBRE Group, Inc., Tony Lessa, San Diego, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
