Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,418
ESTATE OF MAXWELL AGUIRRE, by and through successors in interest, Omar Aguirre and Yvette Aguirre et al v. County of Los Angeles, a public entity et al
as 2:2024cv05318
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF MAXWELL AGUIRRE, by and through successors in interest, Omar Aguirre and Yvette Aguirre, OMAR AGUIRRE and YVETTE AGUIRRE
Defendant: County of Los Angeles, a public entity, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, SHERIFF ROBERT LUNA, in his individual and official capacities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marlene R. Finander v. Julio Jiminez et al
as 5:2024cv01227
Plaintiff: Marlene R. Finander
Defendant: Julio Jiminez and Does 1-100 and or his substitue and or successor and or replacement in his her individual and or official capacities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Ruben Guzman et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv01199
Plaintiff: Estate of Ruben Guzman and Ruben Guzman, Sr.
Defendant: County of Riverside, a public entity, Riverside County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Chad Bianco, in his individual and official capacities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lang v. Laubach et al
as 1:2024cv00245
Plaintiff: shanel-marie Lang
Defendant: Michelle Kanani Laubach in her private and official capacity, As employed by The State of HAWAII, a Corporation, And/or it's subsidiaries with DnB #'s (redacted) doing business as M. KAUNANI LAUBACH, Kelden B.A. Waltjen in his private and official capacity, As employed by The State of HAWAII, a Corporation, And/or it's subsidiaries with DnB #'s (redacted) doing business as KELDON WALTJEN, Brittny Marino in her private and official capacity, As employed by The State of HAWAII, a Corporation, And/or it's subsidiaries with DnB #'s (redacted) doing business as BRITTNY MARINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00720
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Universal Meditech, Inc. et al v. City of Reedley et al
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff: Universal Meditech, Inc. and David He
Defendant: City of Reedley, Jeremy Harrison, Jesalyn Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michelle Bustamante v. County of Riverside et al
as 8:2024cv00856
Plaintiff: Michelle Bustamante
Defendant: County of Riverside, Sheriff Chad Bianco, Sheriff Officer Gustavo Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B. Williams v. The William Warren Group Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02687
Defendant: The William Warren Group Inc. a California Corporation individually also known as WWG Team doing business as StorQuest Self Storage, Bill Hobin individually, and in his official capacity as CEO Ownder Principal Mgr. Chairman of the William Warren Group, individually doing business as StorQuest Self Storage also known as William Warren Hobin, StorQuest Self Storage individually a California Corporation also known as WWG Team doing business as StorQuest Self Storage doing business as The William Warren Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: B. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Grayes et al v. City of Rialto et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01164
Plaintiff: Mark Grayes, Demetrio Jennings, Demetrio Jennings, Sr and others
Defendant: City of Rialto, Ivan Delgadillo, Officer Zamora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lombardo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Governor of Nevada Joseph Lombardo, Attorney General NV Aaron Ford, Nye County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?