Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05877
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Maples v. Pinal, County of et al
as 2:2019cv05300
Plaintiff:
Chris Maples and Estate of Crysta Proctor
Defendant:
Unknown Heinbaugh, Unknown Parties, Unknown Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamez v. Cochise County Adult Probation Department et al
as 4:2019cv00305
Defendant:
Cave Radio 97.7FM, Randy Beel, Michele Beel and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Tamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Land v. El Mirage Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv03169
Plaintiff:
Ashley Land
Defendant:
El Mirage Police Department, Unknown Chairez, Charles Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamez v. Cochise County Attorneys Office et al
as 4:2017cv00249
Plaintiff:
Mario Tamez
Defendant:
Cochise County Attorneys Office, Southern Eastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services, Cochise County Adult Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Scott v. United States Probation Department et al
as 2:2015cv01447
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Probation Department, United States of America, Philippines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McManus v. Mohave County Probation Department et al
as 3:2014cv08209
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene McManus
Defendant:
Mohave County Probation Department, Karen Ganley, Mohave County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
