Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv01221
Plaintiff:
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B Garland, Mary Murguia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Macias et al v. Kaplan-Seikmann et al
as 2:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Jesus Macias and Francine Macias
Defendant:
Drue Kaplan-Seikmann, Britney Galati, Lourde Ramos-Bautista and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Lake Mohave Ranchos Fire District et al
as 3:2021cv08156
Plaintiff:
Karen Jackson
Defendant:
Lake Mohave Ranchos Fire District, Phyllis Aitken, Douglas Braaten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulcher v. Bennett et al
as 2:2020cv00980
Plaintiff:
Jamie Nicole Fulcher
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Child Safety, Barbara Bennett and Phyllis Mitchum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.B. & Roena Cole Joint Trust et al v. Associated Asset Management LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00349
Plaintiff:
A.B. & Roena Cole Joint Trust and Barry L Cox
Defendant:
Associated Asset Management LLC , Phyllis Hengst , Robert Blauvelt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Salas v. Dyer et al
as 4:2010cv00631
Petitioner:
Billie Salas
Respondent:
Clark Dyer , Phyllis Russell , Esperanza En Escalante and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007at10256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
John Doe v. Symington, et al
as 4:1991cv00261
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Rhonda Baldwin , James R Allen , Phyllis Biedess and others
Pecial_master:
Ruth V McGregor (SM)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
