Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Estate of Robert Thomas Sequints et al v. Rivera, Jr. et al
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Estate of Robert Thomas Sequints, Xavier T Sequints, S.S. and others
Defendant:
Miguel Rivera, Jr., Idaho State Police, Steven Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D. Brown v. Holly Fujie, et al
as 16-56154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT THOMAS MOORHEAD, AKA R. Thomas Moorhead, SIERRA MADRE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH, PAUL BECK and others
D. Brown v. Holly Fujie et al
as 2:2016cv04754
Defendant:
Paul Beck, Neil Brown, Lance Cleary and others
Plaintiff:
D. Brown
Robert Thomas v. Oregon State Police, et al
as 14-35229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
OREGON STATE POLICE, SCOTT VAUGHN and TODD BURKE
Thomas v. Oregon State Police et al
as 6:2012cv01167
Defendant:
John Does 1-4, Oregon Parks & Recreation Department, Oregon State Police and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
David Parnell et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 2:2012cv03712
Defendant:
Robert Cornett, County of Riverside, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Marels and David Parnell
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robert Thomas Hamilton, III v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2007cv01599
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Hamilton, III
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Bob Doyle and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
