Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Glasco v. Biden et al
as 2:2024cv02123
Plaintiff:
Tyrone C Glasco, Sr.
Defendant:
Kamala Harris and Joseph R Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00324
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01409
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Nevarez v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2024cv01154
Defendant:
Unknown Armenta, Unknown Klepp, Mesa, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Nevarez, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawkins v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
as 4:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Elkino Dawkins, Sr
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Economic Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Meadows et al v. Haws et al
as 2:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Veronica Ruiz Meadows and GrandMaster G-Man Meadows
Defendant:
David Haws, Barry L Olsen, Estate of Darrell Davis/Jodi McCallister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glasco v. Biden et al
as 2:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Tyrone C Glasco, Sr.
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Barack Obama, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawkins v. Department of Economic Security
as 4:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Elkino Denardo Dawkins, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Economic Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
