Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Wade v. Alsup et al
as 4:2020cv06694
Defendant:
Judge Richard R. Clifton, Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte, Judge Richard Seeborg and others
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Wade v. Alsup et al
as 3:2020cv04489
Defendant:
Judge Richard R. Clifton, Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte, Judge Jon S. Tigar and others
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Amons et al v. Pittsburg City of et al
as 4:2019cv00301
Defendant:
Jesus Arellano, Pittsburg City of and Dillon Tindle
Plaintiff:
Terrell Amons, Terrance Amons and Sandra Talbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salma Agha-Khan v. USA, et al
as 17-56842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D., an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Eastern District of California, FREDERICK CLEMENT, US Bankruptcy Judge and others
Salma Agha-Khan, MD v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv03186
Defendant:
Kirk Edward Sherriff, Debbie Banducci, Barry L Goldner and others
Plaintiff:
Salma Agha-Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv09326
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013at00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gibbs v. McKeon et al
as 3:2010cv01208
Defendant:
Dionel M. Aviles, James T. Conway, John H. Dalton and others
Amicu:
Jane Does 1-50
Plaintiff:
Curtis A. Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
