Cases 121 - 130 of 208
Strick v. Lentz et al
as 3:2014cv05625
Plaintiff:
Andrew Strick
Defendant:
Lentz, Brian K Lynch, Timothy Leo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Turner v. Law Library, et al
as 14-16498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
LAW LIBRARY, NEVADA DOC, HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON and others
James Hinkley v. Rod Shumate, et al
as 14-35602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MARK HINKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROD SHUMATE, BERNARD WARNER, SCOTT FRANKS and others
Wildermuth v. DOC et al
as 2:2014cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dean Wildermuth
Defendant:
DOC and AHCC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Buck v. Wilison et al
as 2:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
Eric S Buck
Defendant:
Jeremy Wilison, U S Marshals, Tracy Engdhal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Turner v. Law Library, et al
as 14-15995
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
LAW LIBRARY, NEVADA DOC, HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON and others
Phillip Hausken v. D Lewis, et al
as 14-35341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP BURTON HAUSKEN
Defendant - Appellee:
D LEWIS, Trust Accounting Manger, DOC, JOYCE MORRELL, Administrator of Inmate Betterment Fund and DAWN THOMPSON, Risk Management Office
Charles Daniel, Jr. v. L'Menreux, et al
as 14-35189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DANIEL, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
L'MENREUX, Classification Counselor, Stafford Creek Correctional Center, KHAMARI CLAGGIOAN, Counselor, Stafford Creek Correctional Center, MCELRAVY, CPM, Stafford Creek Correctional Center and others
Turner v. Law Library et al
as 2:2014cv00163
Defendant:
HDSP, Law Library, Nevada DOC and others
Plaintiff:
John Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Nevada DOC et al
as 2:2014cv00170
Defendant:
Neven Dwight, T. Filson, High Desert Prison and others
Plaintiff:
John Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
