Cases 121 - 130 of 12,514
Michalek v. Hopkins et al
as 3:2024cv05289
Plaintiff:
Brian Judah Michalek
Defendant:
Hopkins, Wright-Brown, Lungsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Mott et al
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Carrie Ash Mott, John Doe, The Joint Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belmonte v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Damers Shirak Duranzan and David Belmonte
Defendant:
King County, King County Department of Public Defense, Anita Khandelwal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindahl v. Thatcher
as 3:2024cv05160
Petitioner:
Peter Anton Lindahl
Respondent:
Thatcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reynoso v. Welch et al
as 1:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Jose Reynoso
Defendant:
Welch, Joseph Brusic and Lisa Rapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05281
Petitioner:
Francisco Salgado Rojas
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
Eugene Brian Garvie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnston v. Nelson et al
as 3:2024cv05271
Plaintiff:
Jacob A Johnston
Defendant:
Nelson, Frank Gilletti, Heather Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05284
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gossett v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05131
Petitioner:
Mark Jonathan Gossett
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
