Cases 131 - 140 of 120,781
Martin v. Cunningham et al
as 3:2024cv03208
Plaintiff:
Kyle Ed Martin
Defendant:
Dr. Britney Cunningham, Melanie Hoover and Nurse Carlo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Narciso Ramirez v. C. Pfeiffer
as 2:2024cv04529
Petitioner:
Narciso Ramirez
Respondent:
C. Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tony Ray Davis v. Correctional Officer E. Castillo et al
as 2:2024cv04489
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Davis
Defendant:
Correctional Officer E. Castillo, Correctional Officer J. Coleman, M. Cardenas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Tessmer v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01500
Petitioner:
Robert Henry Tessmer Jr.
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Mitchell v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Corey Mitchell
Defendant:
R. St. Andre, R. Broomfield, N. Albonico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Sipes v. Corcoran California State Prison
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Todd Sipes
Respondent:
Corcoran California State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01511
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene James
Respondent:
Sacramento County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Diaz v. Gonzales
as 2:2024cv01507
Plaintiff:
Jesus Diaz
Defendant:
E. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard Brown Jr v. Marcus Pollard
as 2:2024cv04524
Petitioner:
Bernard Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
Marcus Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luckert v. Newark Police Dept.
as 4:2024cv03196
Plaintiff:
Michael Landon Luckert
Defendant:
Newark Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
