Cases 11 - 20 of 194
(PC)Heredia v. Thomas et al
as 1:2022cv01439
Plaintiff:
William Martin Heredia
Defendant:
J. Thomas, Ortiz, D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Pollard et al
as 3:2022cv01709
Plaintiff:
Abel J. Garcia
Defendant:
M. Pollard, M. Carrillo, Y. Abdi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Adams v. Riverside County Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility
as 5:2022cv01636
Plaintiff:
Rodney Adams
Defendant:
Riverside County Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility, Stan Lee, Jorge Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Johnson v. A. Cuevas, et al
as 22-16394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. CUEVAS, RON DAVIS, T. ALLEN and others
(PC) Aguirre v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Aaron Aguirre
Defendant:
Officer D. Smith and Officer Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguirre v. Smith
as 2:2022at00888
Plaintiff:
Aaron Aguirre
Defendant:
D Smith and N. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Christopher Alexis Sandor v. Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility
as 5:2022cv01408
Petitioner:
Christopher Alexis Sandor
Respondent:
Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derrick Deon Horton v. Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility
as 5:2022cv01213
Petitioner:
Derrick Deon Horton
Respondent:
Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Cuevas et al
as 5:2021cv05264
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
A. Cuevas, Ron Davis, T. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Smith v. Sacramento County
as 2:2021cv00439
Respondent:
Sacramento County
Petitioner:
Devin Smith and Devin D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
