Cases 11 - 20 of 59
(PC) Davis v. Kings County Board of Supervisors, et al.
as 1:2018cv01667
Defendant:
Carrie R. Woolley, Kings County Board of Supervisors, Kings County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Janice Taylor v. David Campbell, et al
as 18-15430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANICE SUE TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID G. CAMPBELL, CHARLES FLANAGAN and JOSEPH WAGONER
Taylor v. Campbell et al
as 2:2018cv00498
Plaintiff:
Janice Sue Taylor
Defendant:
David G Campbell , Charles Flanagan and Joseph Wagoner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morales v. Davey et al
as 1:2017cv01673
Plaintiff:
Jose Lorenzo Morales
Defendant:
Dave Davey, J. Gallagher, R. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ralph Garbarini v. Wayne Ulit, et al
as 17-17298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH GARBARINI
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE ULIT, Doctor at California State Prison Corcoran, DAVID G. SMITH, Orthopedic Surgeon for California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JONG YEOUNG MOON, Doctor at California State Prison Corcoran and others
Taylor v. USA
as 2:2017cv02581
Respondent:
USA , David G Campbell, Frank T Galati and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Santana v. McCoy et al
as 1:2017cv00941
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Garcia Santana
Defendant:
M. McCoy, R. Davidson, Julian Metts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor Fourstar, Jr. v. Richard Kane, et al
as 16-35716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD KANE, BRIAN MORRIS, DONALD W. MOLLOY and others
Charles Davila v. David Smith
as 16-16525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DAVILA
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID G. SMITH, M.D.
David G. Lara v. County of Riverside Sheriff s Department et al
as 5:2016cv01529
Defendant:
Marion Ashley, John Benoit, County of Riverside Sheriff s Department and others
Plaintiff:
David G. Lara
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
