Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Donnie O'Neal, Jr. v. CDC, et al
as 12-17384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNIE RAY O'NEAL, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, K. ALLISON, Warden at CSATF, A. ENENMOH, C.M.O. at CSATF and others
Patrick Demery v. A. Enenmoh, et al
as 12-16472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK F. DEMERY
Defendant - Appellee:
A. ENENMOH, CMO, JEAN PIERRE, Physician's Assistant, ROBINSON, M.D. and others
Callender v. Castillo et al
as 2:2012cv01708
Plaintiff:
Vincent Anthony Callender
Defendant:
M. Castillo, Landsdale J. Peters, Godwin Ugwueze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin Brummett, Jr. v. Robert Sillen, et al
as 12-15235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN RAY BRUMMETT, Jr.
Defendant:
ROBERT SILLEN, N. GRANNIS, P. MCGUINNESS, M.D. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
S. KAUR
Steve Wilhelm v. Anthony Enenmoh, et al
as 11-16325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE H. WILHELM
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY ENENMOH, (CMO) Chief Medical Officer, G. MILLER, Appeals Coordinator, ARON ROTMAN, Doctor and others
Rosales v. Walker et al
as 1:2011cv00508
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rosales
Defendant:
J. Walker, S. Umi, G. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosales v. Walker et al
as 1:2010cv02402
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rosales
Defendant:
J. Walker, S. Umi Hene, G. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Wilhelm v. Enenmoh et al
as 1:2010cv01663
Plaintiff:
Steve Wilhelm
Defendant:
Anthony Enenmoh, G. Miller, Aron Rotman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Skoinik et al
as 3:2010cv00464
Defendant:
John Baldwin, James Brown, Director of DOC II and others
Plaintiff:
Spencer Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2010cv03105
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Calhoun
Defendant:
J. Sanchez, R. High, C. J. Tschabold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
