Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Otis Thomas v. Michael Mattox, et al
as 17-56916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTIS MICHAEL THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MATTOX, Sgt.; No. 3373, in official capacity, JUSTIN EISENBERG, Captain, in official capacity, MARTIN BLAND, Senior Management Analyst, Official Capacity and others
Niedermeyer v. Mascher et al
as 3:2017cv08056
Plaintiff:
Jason Douglas Niedermeyer
Defendant:
Scott Mascher, Stephen Edgar, Daphne Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Almy v. Minor Adams, et al
as 16-17289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN ALMY
Defendant - Appellee:
MINOR ADAMS, DR. ARANAS, R. BAKER and others
Kevin Almy v. Minor Adams, et al
as 16-17286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN ALMY
Defendant - Appellee:
MINOR ADAMS, DR. ARANAS, R. BAKER and others
Almy v. Adams
as 3:2016cv00231
Defendant:
Minor Adams, Dr. Aranas, R. Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Almy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otis Michael Thomas v. Sgt. Michael Mattox et al
as 2:2016cv02866
Defendant:
Charlie Beck, Charlie Beck, Justin Eisenberg and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Michael Thomas
Claude Dave Mattox Jr. v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2015cv07446
Petitioner:
Claude Dave Mattox, Jr
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Jose Parra Ascencio v. Robert Hernandez, et al
as 13-56939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS PARRA ASCENCIO
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HERNANDEZ, Warden at Donovan State Prison, ROSITAS, Counselor at Donovan State Prison, JOE DOE, Correctional Sergeant in R&R and others
Parra Ascencio v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2013cv01538
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Parra Ascencio
Defendant:
Robert Hernandez, Rositas, Joe Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Mattox v. Castrol, et al
as 13-15986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MATTOX
Defendant - Appellee:
CASTROL, Sgt., E. MARTINEZ, MARQUEZ, Lt. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
