Cases 11 - 20 of 928
Bazzo v. State of California et al
as 3:2023cv01707
Plaintiff:
Frank Monaco Bazzo
Defendant:
State of California, CDCR, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robles v. McDowell
as 4:2023cv04405
Petitioner:
Lomeli Gomez Robles
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Lack v. Posner, et al
as 23-55522
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LACK and DAVID JAMES LACK
Defendant / Appellee:
POSNER, Dr; CTF Soledad Prison Chief Medical Officer, BRIAN COTA, DDA, CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden, CTF Soledad Warden and others
Robles v. McDowell
as 3:2023cv01011
Petitioner:
Lomeli Gomez Robles
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Esequiel Garcia v. Neil McDowell, et al
as 23-15587
Petitioner / Appellant:
ESEQUIEL GARCIA
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden and RAYTHEL FISHER, Warden
Craven v. Garcia
as 3:2023cv01822
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Neil Craven
Defendant:
Jose Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sisk v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Adam Neil Sisk
Defendant:
State of Washington, Western State Hospital and Department of Social and Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Murillo v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2023cv00441
Petitioner:
Jose Murillo
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Trevino v. Sheehan et al
as 2:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
X. Sheehan, Neil Schneider, Ryan Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saul Bruce Preciado v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv00769
Petitioner:
Saul Bruce Preciado
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
