Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Rogstad v. Richardson et al
as 1:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
Jesse Rogstad
Defendant:
Warden Richardson and IDOC Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Richardson
as 1:2023cv00574
Petitioner:
Sebastian Hernandez
Respondent:
Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Creech v. Richardson
as 1:2023cv00463
Petitioner:
Thomas Eugene Creech
Respondent:
Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Hall v. Richardson
as 1:2023cv00335
Petitioner:
Erick Virgil Hall
Respondent:
Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Stone v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Scott Stone
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Page et al
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
Chad Page, Amanda Gentry, Jay Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willard v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Cody Willard
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Omar Padilla
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges-Foote v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kylie Hodges-Foote
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Johnothon Morrison
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
