Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02246
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Segura v. Kast et al
as 6:2020cv01400
Defendant:
Sgt. Jochums, Sheriff Joe Kast, Deputy Onerdo and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Segura, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Segura v. Miller et al
as 6:2020cv00911
Plaintiff:
Pedro Segura, Sr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Miller, Cherno, Crites and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wicks et al v. Grove et al
as 3:2020cv00812
Defendant:
Columbia County Sheriffs Dept., Judge Ted Grove, Jeffery Auxier and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Wicks, Sr. and Norman Wicks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrary v. Blewitt
as 2:2020cv00537
Respondent:
T. Blewitt
Petitioner:
Dathan Jude McCrary, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCrary v. Wingfeild et al
as 3:2020cv00534
Defendant:
Amy Holmes Hehn, Derek L. Carmon, Davonne R. Zentner and others
Plaintiff:
Dathan Jude McCrary, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrary v. Multnomah County, Oregon et al
as 3:2020cv00492
Defendant:
Edward J. Jones, J. Eric Zimmerman, Multnomah County, Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Dathan Jude McCrary, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgell v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2019cv01917
Defendant:
John 1-10 Doe, Oregon Department of Corrections (O.D.O.C.), Thomas Bristol and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Sturgell, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reagan v. EOCI et al
as 2:2019cv01705
Defendant:
Lt. Tackett, Officer D. Johnson, Susan Washburn and others
Plaintiff:
John Michael Joseph Dean Reagan, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Peters et al
as 2:2019cv00376
Defendant:
Appropriate Housing Officer, Appropriate Job Assignment employee, Appropriate Personal BHS Counselor of Inmate Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Edward Cox, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
