Cases 11 - 20 of 141
Scott v. Michell et al
as 3:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
Melissa Michell, Gaylene Fukagawa, Vanessa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrence Lewis v. R. Waters
as 2:2023cv02267
Plaintiff:
Terrence Lewis
Defendant:
R. Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Waters et al
as 3:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
Cody R. Taylor
Defendant:
C E 1 R. Waters, C/O Ater Velasquez, Sergeant Puente and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mallard v. Spangler, et al.
as 1:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Chansler Mallard
Defendant:
Mason Spangler, Gray, Justin Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Evans v. Peedy et al
as 2:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Evans
Defendant:
R. Peedy, B. Warren, R. Leslie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Langford v. Daniels et al
as 3:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Justin Odell Langford
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Steve Sisolak, Scott Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Waters v. Walter Kelly, et al
as 22-55797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LYNN WATERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTER KELLY, Acting Chief Probation Officer, RONALD MCMILLAN, Deputy Probation Officer, South Central Area Office and ROBERT ELLIS, SDPO
Michael Lynn Waters v. B. Cates
as 2:2022cv05019
Petitioner:
Michael Lynn Waters
Respondent:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Lynn Waters v. Walter Kelly et al
as 2:2022cv04733
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Waters
Defendant:
Walter Kelly, Ronald McMillan and Robert Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, Kelly Ballanger, Gloria Waters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
