Cases 11 - 20 of 33,985
Rios v. Maricopa County Estrella Jail
as 2:2024cv02960
Defendant:
Maricopa County Estrella Jail
Plaintiff:
Andrea AnaLisia Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez #125246 v. Heller et al
as 2:2024cv02965
Plaintiff:
Louis Alfonso Melendez
Defendant:
Benjamin Heller and Matthew Heller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Figueroa v. NaphCare et al
as 4:2024cv00526
Defendant:
NaphCare and Chris Nanos
Plaintiff:
Alexander Augustine Gonzalez-Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nash v. Unknown Party
as 4:2024cv00524
Petitioner:
Darnell Nash
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nash v. Unknown Party
as 4:2024cv00525
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Petitioner:
Darnell Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jaramillo v. Maricopa County Jail
as 2:2024cv02962
Defendant:
Maricopa County Jail
Plaintiff:
Franchesca Jaramillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv02923
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Arizona, State of, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Tohono O'odham Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00514
Defendant:
Desert Diamond Casino, Unknown Party and Tohono O'odham Police Department
Plaintiff:
Donald Douglas Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barcelo-Samaniego #356828 v. Galaviz et al
as 4:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Barcelo-Samaniego
Defendant:
JM Galaviz and Chris Nanos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanzer #143647 v. Thornell
as 2:2024cv02888
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.