Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Leavitt v. Gentry et al
as 2:2016cv02755
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Todd Mitchell Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bank v. The Hon Michelle Leavitt et al
as 2:2016cv01045
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and The Hon Michelle Leavitt
Petitioner:
Steven Javier Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Macomber et al
as 2:2016cv00830
Plaintiff:
Grady Harris
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, K. Rose, J. Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cathy v. Moltzen, et al.
as 2:2015cv01646
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Cathy
Defendant:
E. Moltzen, D. Leavitt, T. Thorpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilk v. Neven et al
as 2:2015cv01429
Defendant:
Cary Leavitt and Dwight Neven
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Cox et al
as 2:2015cv00863
Defendant:
Greg Cox, Jerry Howell, Cory Leavitt and others
Plaintiff:
John Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hiser v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00814
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Greg Cox, Falszeck and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Hiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jamal Damon Hendrix v. Cox et al
as 2:2015cv00560
Defendant:
Linda C. Adams, Anderson, Michael Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Cox et al
as 3:2014cv00667
Defendant:
James G. Cox, Day, CCS3 Cary Leavitt and others
Plaintiff:
Rashon Kalani-Kai King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Cox et al
as 3:2014cv00528
Defendant:
James G. Cox, Day, Cary Leavitt and others
Plaintiff:
Rashon Kalani-Kai King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
