Cases 21 - 30 of 3,063
Anthony David Gonsalves, Jr. v. Superior Court Antelope Valley et al
as 5:2024cv01105
Petitioner:
Anthony David Gonsalves, Jr.
Respondent:
Superior Court Antelope Valley and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Castro v. Covello
as 2:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Castro
Defendant:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovell v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2024cv02071
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Lovell, II
Defendant:
Deputy Sanchez and Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cameron Anthony Morris v. California State Prison Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2024cv04036
Plaintiff:
Cameron Anthony Morris
Defendant:
California State Prison Los Angeles County and M. Salazar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Dean v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01173
Petitioner:
David Dean and David Anthony Dean
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
as 3:2024cv02900
Petitioner:
Anthony Rico Turmer
Defendant:
Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Gooden v. Tracy Johnson
as 2:2024cv02648
Petitioner:
Anthony Gooden
Respondent:
Tracy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rauda
as 5:2024cv02894
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rauda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Anthony Dean v. Unknown
as 5:2024cv00973
Petitioner:
David Anthony Dean
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
