Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Beebe v. Chavez
as 2:2012cv00155
Petitioner:
Justin Wayne Beebe
Respondent:
F. Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 3:2011cv04998
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Martinez
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, Tim Virga, Fred Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01118
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beebe v. Chavez, et. al.
as 2:2011cv02241
Petitioner:
Justin Wayne Beebe
Respondent:
F. Chavez and Matthew Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Savage v. Dickinson et al
as 2:2011cv01652
Plaintiff:
Bob Savage
Defendant:
K. Dickinson, M. Cates, J. Bick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savage v. Dickinson et al
as 3:2011cv02055
Plaintiff:
Bob Savage
Defendant:
K. Dickinson, M. Cates, J. Bick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Glass v. A. Scribner, et al
as 11-15109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD GLASS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. K. SCRIBNER, K. Anderson C. Espinoza M. Randolph F. Fuhldort F. Lieutenant M. Seifert W. Villarreal L. wood J. Yates D. Ortiz D. Zavala C/O Henderson Weber L. Brock J. Buckley V. Castillo D. Means B. Steeter, D. BAILY, D. BEEBE and others
Donald Glass v. A. Scribner, et al
as 09-17450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD GLASS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. K. SCRIBNER, K. ANDERSON, C. ESPINOZA and others
Beaty v. Hanf et al
as 2:2008cv01301
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Beaty
Defendant:
Ted Hanf, Medical Staff, Beebe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Skolnik et al
as 2:2008cv01310
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Johnson
Defendant:
Howard Skolnik, James G. Cox, D. W. Neven and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
