Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Taylor v. Smith et al
as 2:2015cv01699
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lamont Taylor
Respondent:
S. Smith, Coffin, C. Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Smith et al
as 1:2015cv01430
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lamont Taylor
Respondent:
S. Smith, Coffin, C. Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holgerson v. Lizarraga et al
as 2:2014cv01767
Plaintiff:
Matthew Forrey Holgerson
Defendant:
Joe A. Lizarraga, - Ivey, Traci Danson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfred Nichelson v. State of Oregon US District Co, et al
as 12-35706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED A. NICHELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON US DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON, MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS M. COFFIN, OREGON SUPREME COURT CHIEF JUSTICE BREWER, COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON, PRESIDING JUDGE LANDAU, ORTEGA & SERCOMBE and others
Eric Wheeler v. Aliceson et al
as 1:2012cv00860
Plaintiff:
Eric Wheeler
Defendant:
K. Aliceson, R. Coffin, R. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffin v. Evans
as 2:2010cv00026
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Coffin
Respondent:
Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meeks v. Haggerty et al
as 3:2009cv00747
Plaintiff:
John Morgan Meeks
Defendant:
A. Haggerty, Hogan, Coffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffin v. Haviland
as 2:2009cv01556
Petitioner:
William C. Coffin
Respondent:
James Haviland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohsen v. Moss et al
as 3:2009cv01426
Plaintiff:
Amr Mohsen
Defendant:
Joel Moss, Christopher Forvour, David Carr and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jensen v. Coffin et al
as 4:2007cv00400
Plaintiff:
Vicki Arlene Jensen
Defendant:
Sgt Coffin, Greesen, Genera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
