Cases 21 - 30 of 454
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 23-15567
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson, K WERNER, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist at USP-Tucson, L UNRUH-PARKER, SOMP Psychologist at USP-Tucson and others
(PC) Parker v. Lynch et al
as 2:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
Melvin A. Parker
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, A Watts, S. Corturs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Charles v. Fhuere et al
as 6:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Calvin H Charles
Defendant:
Corey Fhuere, Heidi Steward, C/O Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Ed et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Diondrae Parker
Defendant:
Ed, Davis, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Parker v. Lynch
as 2:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Melvin Parker and Melvin A. Parker
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Duron et al
as 4:2023cv01242
Plaintiff:
Montel Parker
Defendant:
J. Duron, R. Carillo, A. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Parker v. Lynch et al
as 2:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Melvin Parker and Melvin A. Parker
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, N. Burkeheart and J. Connelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Parker v. The People of California
as 1:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Parker
Defendant:
The People of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Parker v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv00197
Petitioner:
Dewayne Parker
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
