Cases 21 - 30 of 740
Reed v. Buckel et al
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Mychal Reed
Defendant:
A. Buckel, S. Steadman, T. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrus v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Reed Barrus
Respondent:
Nethanjah Breitenbach and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malik v. Reed College et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Keith Shazad Malik
Defendant:
Reed College, John Young Taft, Kater Murch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOT USED
as 3:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
Winston Najee Reed
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, A.W. Toliver, A.W. Dresson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Winston Najee Reed
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Ann Toliver, Dressen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Madsen et al
as 5:2023cv06141
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Khan
Defendant:
Haley Madsen, Arlene Stephens, J. A. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manley v. Bristol et al
as 6:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
David Boylen Manley
Defendant:
Dr. Thomas L. Bristol, Dr. Michael T. Puerini, Moriam Balogun, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Reed v. Allison
as 1:2023cv01485
Petitioner:
Mychal Reed
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rankin v. Landers
as 6:2023cv01477
Petitioner:
Lawson Reed Rankin
Respondent:
Sheriff Landers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Reed v. Buckel, et al.
as 1:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Mychal Reed
Defendant:
A Buckel, S. Steadman, T Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
