Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Myers v. US Marshals Service
as 3:2010cv02662
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Myers
Defendant:
US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Coats v. Michael Fox, et al
as 10-16925
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM THOMAS COATS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL FOX, DOROTHY SWINGLE, DOROTHY NEPOMUCENO and others
Sexton v. Edwards
as 3:2010cv08118
Petitioner:
William Thomas Sexton
Respondent:
Robert Edwards, Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sexton v. Lamb
as 3:2010cv08107
Petitioner:
William Thomas Sexton
Respondent:
John Lamb, Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Toney v. Ruiz et al
as 3:2010cv00405
Plaintiff:
Stephen Toney
Defendant:
Victor Ruiz, Julie Hyride Marolli, Truong Ta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coats v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2010cv00412
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Coats
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, R. Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coats v. Kimura et al
as 2:2009cv01830
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Coats
Defendant:
T. Kimura and T. - Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coats v. McDonald
as 2:2009cv01301
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Coats
Defendant:
Mike McDonald and Michael Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coats v. Fox et al
as 2:2009cv01300
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Coats
Defendant:
Michael Fox, Moore, Mike McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Thomas Coats v. Mike McDonald et al
as 2:2009cv01125
Petitioner:
William Thomas Coats
Respondent:
Mike McDonald and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
