Cases 21 - 30 of 11,636
Shields v. State of Nevada ex rel NDOC et al
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Shields
Defendant:
State of Nevada ex rel NDOC, Calvin Johnson, Julie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Divens v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Emile Divens
Defendant:
Julie Williams, M. Stuart, Liang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Rigney et al
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Curtis Rigney, T. Phelps, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Furtado v. Calipatria State Prison
as 4:2024cv02967
Plaintiff:
Andre William Furtado
Defendant:
Calipatria State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lomax v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Petitioner:
Nathan Louis Lomax
Respondent:
Brian Williams, NDOC and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
JoAquin Hill
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Borla
as 5:2024cv02878
Petitioner:
Cameron Williams
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Abdullah v. Santoro, et al.
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
Kelly Santoro, K. Mixon, M. Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Watson v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dale William Watson
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
