Cases 21 - 30 of 14,950
(PC) Martinez v. Galvin, et al.
as 1:2024cv01079
Defendant:
J. Galvin, D. Burns and H. Moseley
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Deegan v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv02471
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Anthony Bell and D. Anderson
Plaintiff:
Sidney Ross Deegan, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benshoof v Warden
as 2:2024cv01110
Interested Party:
Tate D Prows
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Kurt Benshoof
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Daniels v. Kotek et al
as 2:2024cv01538
Defendant:
Dr. Warren Roberts, Downs, Tina Kotek and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah David Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv01439
Petitioner:
Bobby D Colbert
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Casity v. Amador County
as 2:2024cv02449
Defendant:
B. Wheeler, Amador County, Renee C. Day and others
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Casity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00418
Defendant:
Klinton R. Hust, Josh Tewalt, T. Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00416
Defendant:
John Doe Bobiner, T. Valley, Klinton R. Hust and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Byerly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Werre v. Martinez et al
as 2:2024cv01673
Defendant:
K. Groover, B. Williams, R. Oliver and others
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Werre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cisneros v. Rowland, et al.
as 1:2024cv01070
Defendant:
B. Brown, Jim Garcia, D. Rowland and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
