Cases 21 - 30 of 33,414
Lewis #060567 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01252
Plaintiff:
Charles Lewis
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, NaphCare LLP, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Skinner et al
as 2:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hill
Defendant:
Russell Skinner, Unknown Potres and Unknown Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro v. Skinner
as 2:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Jacob Luis Castro
Defendant:
Russell Skinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolivar #325679 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00271
Petitioner:
Ruben Bolivar
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sartor v. Mackin et al
as 3:2024cv08106
Plaintiff:
Jacob William Sartor
Defendant:
Unknown Mackin, Unknown Garrett, Unknown Duchesne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coctecon-Cruz et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01265
Plaintiff:
Hesed Coctecon-Cruz and Elena Cruz Vega
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koroma v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2024cv01278
Plaintiff:
Konbeh Koroma
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Brett Turley, Stephen Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez v. Damoui
as 4:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Marquez
Defendant:
Shahin Damoui
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Fabian Ortiz
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson #337823 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2024cv08104
Petitioner:
Gerald Richardson
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
