Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Lopez v. State of Idaho
as 1:2009cv00641
Petitioner:
Francisco Angulo Lopez
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tony F Angulo v. Board of Parole Hearings
as 5:2009cv00238
Petitioner:
Tony F Angulo
Respondent:
Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mardueno-Angulo v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv01786
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Mardueno-Angulo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Vega-Angulo v. USA
as 4:2008cv00454
Petitioner:
Ramon Elias Vega-Angulo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Vega-Angulo v. USA
as 4:2008cv00451
Petitioner:
Ramon Elias Vega-Angulo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sisneroz et al v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2008cv01358
Plaintiff:
Frank Enepi Sisneroz, George Vasquez, Frank Romas Sumahit and others
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Angulo v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2009cv00198
Plaintiff:
Michael Angulo
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sisneroz et al v. Ahlin et al
as 2:2008cv01697
Plaintiff:
Frank Enepi Sisneroz, George Vasquez, Frank Romas Sumahit and others
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Cynthia A. Radavsky, Montoyo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ubence-Angulo v. United States of America
as 3:2008cv00779
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alberto Ubence-Angulo, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Soto-Angulo v. DeRosa
as 1:2007cv01566
Petitioner:
Roberto Quinto Soto-Angulo
Respondent:
Charles DeRosa, Charles DeRosa and Charles DeRosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
