Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Nance v. Mattos et al
as 2:2017cv04416
Plaintiff:
Keith Preston Nance
Defendant:
John Mattos , Roy Pape, Deborah Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LaPointe #173379 v. Corizon et al
as 2:2016cv03809
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gregory LaPointe
Defendant:
Corizon, Unknown Labar, John Kinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertanelli v. Gieron et al
as 2:2016cv00237
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Unknown Gieron, Unknown Roberts, Unknown Hackney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertanelli v. Gieron et al
as 4:2015cv00568
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Unknown Gieron, Unknown Roberts, Unknown Hackney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertanelli v. Roberts et al
as 2:2015cv02007
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cataldo Bertanelli
Defendant:
Unknown Roberts, Unknown Girar, Unknown Hackney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Unmasking et al v. Stiviano et al
as 2:2015cv00228
Respondent:
Jonathan Stiviano, Arizona Department of Corrections and Benjamin Lanza
Petitioner:
Stephen A Unmasking, Edward Klebold, Jimmy Theola and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCleve #177261 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv02615
Plaintiff:
James Baxter McCleve
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Corizon Health Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2014cv02312
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of and Joseph M Arpaio
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soucy #250271 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv02293
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources Incorporated, Corizon Health Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Soucy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv01833
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ray Scott
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Bell, Unknown Alverez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
