Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Haro v. United States of America
as 4:2011cv00229
Petitioner:
Lorenia Haro
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Haro-Padilla v. United States of America
as 4:2011cv00218
Petitioner:
Trinidad Haro-Padilla
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Haro-Verdugo v. United States of America
as 4:2011cv00179
Petitioner:
Julio Mario Haro-Verdugo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Haro v. Swarthout
as 2:2010cv00410
Petitioner:
Randolph Haro
Respondent:
Gary Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haros v. USA
as 1:2009cv02169
Petitioner:
Octavio Haros
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chris Myers, et al v. Richard Schott, et al
as 09-55359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS MYERS, ERIC E. HOUSTON, BRUCE JACKSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD W. SCHOTT, J. NORWOOD, REVILLE and others
Chris Myers et al v. Robert Haro et al
as 5:2009cv00460
Plaintiff:
Chris Myers, Dean Shelton, Rond Urbon and others
Defendant:
Robert Haro, Horlin Penn, J L Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Chris Myers et al v. J. L. Norwood et al
as 2:2009cv01158
Plaintiff:
Chris Myers, Eric Houston, Tracy Terry and others
Defendant:
J. L. Norwood, Richard Boorn, F. Entzel-Shu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Myers et al v. Schott et al
as 5:2009cv00143
Plaintiff:
Chris Myers, Rand Urban, David Gardner and others
Defendant:
Richard W Schott, J Norwood, Reville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Ramirez v. Rios et al
as 1:2008cv01604
Petitioner:
Cutberto Haro Ramirez
Respondent:
Hector Rios, Hector Rios, Hector Rios and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
