Cases 41 - 50 of 113
Faircloth v. Salmonsen et al
as 2:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Faircloth
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, Dale, Dave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullock v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Russell Wayne Bullock
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Brian Gootkin and Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perfetto v. FNU Harmon et al
as 6:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Andrew Perfetto
Defendant:
FNU Harmon, John/Jane Doe Director of Nursing, Cynthia Wolken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosby v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
John Thurlow Mosby
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen and Mark Lynn McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seese v. Montana State Prison et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Stephen W. Seese
Defendant:
Montana State Prison, Jim Salmonsen, Paul Rees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seese v. Montana State Prison et al
as 9:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Stephen W. Seese
Defendant:
Montana State Prison, Jim Salmonsen, Paul Rees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NezPerce v. Salmonsen
as 2:2022cv00057
Petitioner:
Joseph Denny NezPerce
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitford v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Makueeyapee D. Whitford
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen and C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eva v. Montana State Prison et al
as 6:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Raymond Joseph Eva
Defendant:
Montana State Prison and Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Anthony Evans
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen and Christine Klanecky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
