Cases 41 - 50 of 1,389
(HC) Dunigan v. Lundy
as 2:2023cv02699
Petitioner:
Kevin W. Dunigan
Respondent:
L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCullom
as 4:2023cv05902
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee McCullom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Barnette v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2023cv02632
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wilson Barnette
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Sacramento Police Department, John Paul Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Unknown FBI Agents
as 2:2023cv02622
Plaintiff:
Kevin B. Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown FBI Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv05801
Plaintiff:
Ramello Randle
Defendant:
Kevin Bell, Diana Bectore, Derek Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Murphy Dunbar v. L.A. Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv09495
Plaintiff:
Kevin Murphy Dunbar, Sr.
Defendant:
L.A. Police Department, Chief of Police, David Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Card v. Chin et al
as 3:2023cv05760
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Card
Defendant:
Judge Jason Chin, Sue Young Ra, Joshi Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vines v. Hixon et al
as 5:2023cv05765
Petitioner:
Roosevelt Vines
Respondent:
Acting Warden Kevin Hixon and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Murphy Dunbar v. Facebook.com et al
as 2:2023cv09603
Plaintiff:
Kevin Murphy Dunbar, Sr.
Defendant:
Facebook.com, L.A. County Sheriff Chief Officer and Kevin Mervin Dunberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin W. Dunigan v. L. Lundy
as 2:2023cv09236
Petitioner:
Kevin W. Dunigan
Respondent:
L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
