Cases 41 - 50 of 462
Voits v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv01365
Defendant:
Mss. Kelcie Main, Mss. Kate Brown, Shemia Fagan and others
Plaintiff:
Ivar Voits
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Powell v. Rose et al
as 2:2022cv01275
Plaintiff:
Adam Randolph Powell
Defendant:
E. Rose, A. Plascenia, A. Macovichuk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trost v. Cooke et al
as 3:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Roy Trost and Daisy Lynne Meadows
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke, M.H. Hayman, Don Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray Medina v. R.C. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv04810
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
R.C. Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Respondent:
J. Phelan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Medina v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01163
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
R.C. Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2022cv00923
Plaintiff:
Steven Rose
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Timothy Kelly, Dustin Herron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Littleton v. Montiez et al
as 2:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Michael Littleton
Defendant:
Mark Montiez, Melody Sanders, Anna Treystov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasmine Sanchez v. Sandra Rose
as 22-15840
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASMINE PAUL SANCHEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
SANDRA ROSE
Patu v. Stemler et al
as 2:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Solomona Ricky Patu
Defendant:
Lee Stemler, Stephan Rose and Brandi Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collinson v. Rose et al
as 1:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Cory Allan Collinson
Defendant:
Haley Jean Rose, Idaho Department of Corrections, Mikayla Desjarlais and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
