Cases 41 - 50 of 3,152
(PC) Younger v. Officer Alvarez et al
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Brandi Adrienne Younger
Defendant:
Alvarez, Gonzales, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larkin v. Cabraser et al
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Billy F. Larkin
Defendant:
Elizabeth J. Cabraser, Krsitopher S. Ritter, Stephen J. Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torrence v. Hamilton
as 3:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Patrick H. Torrence
Respondent:
Jason Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Steve Young, Warden Richardson, SGT. Smyth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Fhuere et al
as 2:2023cv01984
Plaintiff:
Harlan James Hale
Defendant:
Corey Fhuere, Dr. B.T. Smith, K. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holley v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
Nicholas H Holley
Defendant:
Warden Ty Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Parlow et al
as 6:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Patricia Parlow, Lane County DAs Office, Erick Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Jones et al
as 6:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Scott Jones, Erick T. Knapp, Kamala H Shugar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County, Erik T Knapp, Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Shugan et al
as 6:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Kamala H Shugar, Lane County DAs Office, Erick T. Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
