Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Ippolito v. Stoll-Underwood et al
as 6:2012cv00184
Defendant: Corporate Entity Known as Douglas County, County of Douglas, Randolph Lee Garrison and others
Plaintiff: David Allen Ippolito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Allen Perysian v. Timothy E Busby We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv05578
Respondent: Timothy E Busby
Petitioner: David Allen Perysian
David Falls v. James Yate
as 11-16567
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID ALLEN FALLS
Respondent - Appellee: JAMES A. YATES
Ippolito v. DeCamp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00676
Defendant: Joe DeCamp and Mr. M. Nooth
Plaintiff: David Allen Ippolito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Cook v. Mark Nooth
as 11-35408
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID ALLEN COOK
Respondent - Appellee: MARK NOOTH, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Nichols v. Harris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00368
Petitioner: David Allen Nichols
Respondent: Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Falls v. James Yate
as 10-17613
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID ALLEN FALLS
Respondent - Appellee: JAMES A. YATES
Dalrymple v. Wengler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00494
Petitioner: David Allen Dalrymple
Respondent: Timothy Wengler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frey v. Martin et al
as 3:2010cv06218
Defendant: Assistant District Attorney, County Commissioner, Governor and others
Plaintiff: David Allen Frey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Vail We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv05162
Petitioner: David Allen Hawkins
Respondent: Eldon Vail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?