Cases 51 - 60 of 663
(PC) Cotton v. Medina et al
as 1:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
Wesley Cotton
Defendant:
Sgt. Medina and Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Windham, Jr. v. C. Wofford, et al
as 22-15387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL WINDHAM, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
C. WOFFORD, Associate Warden, C. SHELLING, Associate Warden, J. MEDINA, Associate Warden and others
(PC) Alley v. Saelee et al
as 2:2022cv00661
Plaintiff:
Rodger Alley
Defendant:
Allen Saelee, Randy Denniston, Jorge Estupinan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howell v. Vera et al
as 1:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Defendant:
N. Vera, I. Medina, I. Ceballos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Lacap, Jr.
as 3:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cloyd Harley Medina Lacap, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Manolo Medina Aguilar v. A Emondi
as 2:2022cv00472
Plaintiff:
Manolo Medina Aguilar
Defendant:
Al Emondi, Guarav Sharma, Patrick Ganzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alberto Hinojosa Medina v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2022cv00368
Petitioner:
Alberto Hinojosa Medina
Respondent:
Ramond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huynh v. Martella et al
as 3:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Defendant:
C. Martella, M. Sanchez, E. Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murillo v. Thich et al
as 3:2021cv09973
Plaintiff:
R. Mona Murillo
Defendant:
John Thich, E. Beam, Veronica Lomeli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Casteneda v. Quiring et al
as 2:2021cv02196
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Casteneda
Defendant:
J. Quiring, K. McTaggart, Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
