Cases 61 - 70 of 161
Antonio M. Taylor v. USP Warden Milunsic
as 2:2019cv07060
Respondent:
USP Warden Milunsic
Petitioner:
Antonio M. Taylor and Antonio M Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PC) Huff v. Moore et al
as 1:2019cv01248
Defendant:
Thomas Moore, USP Atwater Prison Officials, Andre Matevousian and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Huff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Van Gessel v. Moore et al.
as 1:2018cv01478
Defendant:
Altuire, Dr. Thomas Moore, USP Atwater and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen Van Gessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin Jonassen v. USA, et al
as 18-16621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN JONASSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARCUM, CO, USP Tuscon, JOHANNES, Correctional Officer, USP Tucson and others
Paul Free v. Nader Peikar, et al
as 18-16329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL FREE
Defendant - Appellee:
NADER PEIKAR, Facility Doctor at USP Atwater, LOURDES METTRI, Medical Administrator at USP Atwater, LISA FUENTES-ARCE, Employee at USP Atwater and others
Bowlson v. USP-Atwater, Warden
as 1:2018cv00753
Petitioner:
Arthur Bowlson
Respondent:
USP-Atwater, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edward Hohner v. Richard Ives, et al
as 18-55623
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD DEAN HOHNER
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD IVES, Warden and USP-LOMPOC, CALIFORNIA
Ronald Harley v. J. Shartle
as 18-15755
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD HARLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden, Warden, USP Tucson
Marco Alferez v. R. Rhode
as 18-15420
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCO ANTONIO ALFEREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
R. L. RHODES, Warden USP-Tucson
Roscoe Chambers v. Allen, et al
as 18-55256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLEN, Chief Health Physician, in official capacity, HARDY, Senior Deputy, USP McCreary Orthopedic Doctor, POYNER, USP Health Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
