Cases 71 - 80 of 2,128
Van Huisen v. County of Alameda
as 4:2023cv03255
Petitioner:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Respondent:
County of Alameda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herman Tamrat v. County of Alameda, et al
as 23-15936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HERMAN TAMRAT
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, a Municipal Corporation, ALAMEDA COUNTY SANTA RITA JAIL ADMINISTRATION, GREGORY J. AHERN and others
Felder v. Ahern
as 4:2023cv03201
Petitioner:
Marcus Dieter Felder
Respondent:
Gregory J. Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC)Givens v. Trate
as 1:2023cv00954
Petitioner:
Gregory Latrell Givens
Respondent:
B. M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Van Huisen v. County of Alameda
as 2:2023cv01180
Petitioner:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Respondent:
County of Alameda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDowell v. Murphy
as 5:2023cv02971
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cash McDowell
Defendant:
Trevor Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Van Huisen v. DEA et al
as 2:2023cv01116
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency, Dobewood Derrin, William Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Collins et al
as 3:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott, III
Defendant:
Collins and Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fritz v. Garrett
as 3:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
Gregory A. Fritz
Respondent:
Timothy Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Duclos v. Lynch et al
as 2:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, J. Gregory, T. Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
