Cases 81 - 90 of 879
Misch et al v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2022cv05278
Plaintiff:
David Misch and Keith H. Washington
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Aramark, Sheriff Greg Ahern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01357
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Fields v. Sanchez, et al.
as 1:2022cv01122
Plaintiff:
Devonte Fields
Defendant:
J Sanchez, J. Flores and J. Burnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Sanchez Jimenez v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2022cv06401
Plaintiff:
Jose Sanchez Jimenez
Defendant:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez-Rivera v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv01254
Plaintiff:
Juan Sanchez-Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Cisneros et al
as 3:2022cv01159
Petitioner:
Josue Israel Sanchez
Respondent:
T. Cisneros and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peralta-Sanchez v. U.S.A.
as 5:2022cv04469
Petitioner:
Omar Peralta-Sanchez
Respondent:
U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Crane v. Lopez et al
as 1:2022cv00922
Plaintiff:
Richard Joseph Crane
Defendant:
G. Lopez, Debbie Asuncion, Daniel Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teral Sherman v. James S. Hill et al
as 5:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Teral Sherman
Defendant:
James S. Hill, M. Torres, D. Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teral Sherman v. James S. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv04676
Plaintiff:
Teral Sherman
Defendant:
James S. Hill, M. Torres, D. Mortimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
