Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Yassin v. Smith et al
as 6:2024cv01104
Defendant:
Warren G. Roberts, Benjamin T. Smith, Joe Bugher and others
Plaintiff:
Hussein Ahmed Yassin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yassin v. Gonzalez
as 6:2024cv01003
Defendant:
Juanita Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Hussein Ahmed Yassin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Two and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. California Dept. of Correction & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2024cv02769
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
California Dept. of Correction & Rehabilitation and Ronald Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Doe, Dentist et al
as 3:2024cv02771
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dentist, John Doe, Dentist and Theodore Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. White et al
as 3:2024cv02773
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
Dr. White, Rachel Chen and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Cook et al
as 3:2024cv02770
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
Aaron Cook and Alison Pachynski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembriu v. Doe
as 3:2024cv02768
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembriu
Defendant:
Teacher Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2024cv02772
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Eman Elmi, Marinna Ashe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
